Abstract
Asia has urbanized and growing urban population demands for better urban mobility services. There are concerted efforts by authorities to improve public transport in Asian cities. However, the mode share of public transport is still low in many cities and use of personal vehicles is dominant. This is leading to an increase in congestion, consumption of fossil fuels, road accidents, emissions, and air pollution. The quality and reliability of public transport services play an important role in attracting more commuters. Stakeholders’ participation is an important aspect of urban transport planning according to their needs. The paper presents the findings of a survey of public transport users in five Asian cities. The user satisfaction surveys along key public transport routes indicate mixed results. While the users are satisfied with services in Bandung, Thimphu and Tehran, majority of survey respondents in Dhaka and Ho Chi Minh city are not satisfied with the public transport services. The results provide useful insights for transport planners and public transport regulators and operators to improve accessibility, safety, quality and reliability of public transport systems. The improvement of services would help to attract more commuters to the system and increase the mode share of public transport thereby enhancing the overall sustainability of public transport systems.
References
United Nations. World Urbanization Prospects 2018: Highlights [Internet]. New York, NY: United Nations; 2019. Available from: https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/3828520/files/WUP2018-Highlights.pdf.
TomTom Index. Homepage [Internet]. TomTom Index; 2023. Available from: https://www.tomtom.com/en_gb/traffic-index/.
Göransson J, Andersson H. Factors that make public transport systems attractive: a review of travel preferences and travel mode choices. European Transport Research Review. 2023;15(1):32.
BRT data. Key Indicators per Country [Internet]. BRT data. Available from: https://brtdata.org/location/asia.
Vij A, Ryan S, Sampson S, Harris S. Consumer preferences for on-demand transport in Australia. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice. 2020;132:823-839.
Canitez F. Transferring sustainable urban mobility policies: An institutional perspective. Transport Policy. 2020;90:1-12.
Shyr OF, Andersson DE, Cheng Y-H, Hsiao Y-H. What explains rapid transit use? Evidence from 97 urbanized areas. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice. 2017;100:162-169.
Chen J-H, Nguyen HTT, Chou C-C, Wang J-P, Wang T-K. Transit-oriented development: exploring citizen perceptions in a Booming City, Can Tho City, Vietnam. Sustainability. 2021;13(3):1370.
Chang Z, Phang S-Y. Urban rail transit PPPs: lessons from East Asian cities. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice. 2017;105:106-122.
Regmi MB, S. Swamy, S. Sugathan and B. Pakvisal. Integrated Public Transport Systems: Emerging trends [Internet]. Bangkok, Thailand: ESCAP; 2024. Available from: https://www.unescap.org/blog/integration-urban-public-transport-systems-emerging-trends.
Suman HK, Bolia NB, Tiwari G. Comparing public bus transport service attributes in Delhi and Mumbai: Policy implications for improving bus services in Delhi. Transport Policy. 2017;56:63-74.
Davis DE. Urban Transport and Transformative Change: Reflections on the relationships between processes and outcomes. In: Davis DEaA, Alan, editor. Transforming Urban Transport. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2018. p. 281-304.
Diab EI, Badami MG, El-Geneidy AM. Bus transit service reliability and improvement strategies: Integrating the perspectives of passengers and transit agencies in North America. Transport Reviews. 2015;35(3):292-328.
Soza-Parra J, Raveau S, Muñoz JC, Cats O. The underlying effect of public transport reliability on users’ satisfaction. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice. 2019;126:83-93.
Regmi MB. Governance of urban mobility policies and plans in Asian cities. Transport Policy. 2024;149:108-121.
Mozos-Blanco MÁ, Pozo-Menéndez E, Arce-Ruiz R, Baucells-Aletà N. The way to sustainable mobility. A comparative analysis of sustainable mobility plans in Spain. Transport Policy. 2018;72:45-54.
Weicker T. Marshrutka (in) formality in southern Russian cities and its role in contentious transport policies. Geoforum. 2022;136:262-272.
De Oña J. The role of involvement with public transport in the relationship between service quality, satisfaction and behavioral intentions. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice. 2020;142:296-318.
ESCAP. Assessment of Urban Transport and Impacts of COVID-19 on Mobility: Data Collection Guideline [Internet]. Bangkok, Thailand: ESCAP; 2020. Available from: https://www.unescap.org/sites/default/files/SUTI%20Data%20Collection%20Guideline%20_%202020%20updated.docx_.pdf.
Dirgahayani P, Sutanto H. The effect of transport demand management policy on the intention to use public transport: A case in Bandung, Indonesia. Case studies on transport policy. 2020;8(3):1062-1072.
Munira S, San Santoso D. Examining public perception over outcome indicators of sustainable urban transport in Dhaka city. Case studies on transport policy. 2017;5(2):169-178.
Joewono TB, Santoso DS, Ningtyas DU. The causal relationship of the service quality of the TransJakarta Busway. Public Transport. 2012;4:77-100.
Purba A, Nakamura F, Tanaka S, Sanit P, Ariyoshi R. Evaluating TransJogja service quality based on user perceptions and expectations. Journal of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies. 2015;11:1173-1187.
Gaspay SM, Tiglao NC, Tacderas MA, Tolentino NJ, Ng AC. Reforms in Metro Manila's bus transport system hastened by the Covid-19 pandemic: A policy capacity analysis of the EDSA busway. Research in Transportation Economics. 2023;100:101305.
Skorobogatykh I, Timokhina G, Mkhitaryan S, Ivashkova N, Shirochenskaya I. Managing customer satisfaction with Metropolitan Public Transport Services based on perceived quality assessments. Journal of Eastern European and Central Asian Research (JEECAR). 2022;9(3):447-461.
Nadeem M, Azam M, Asim M, Al-Rashid MA, Puan OC, Campisi T. Does Bus Rapid Transit System (BRTS) meet the citizens’ mobility needs? Evaluating performance for the case of Multan, Pakistan. Sustainability. 2021;13(13):7314.
Soltanpour A, Mesbah M, Habibian M. Customer satisfaction in urban rail: a study on transferability of structural equation models. Public Transport. 2020;12:123-146.
United Nations. Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development [Internet]. United Nations; 2015. Available from: https://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda.
Wallin Andreassen T. (Dis) satisfaction with public services: the case of publictransportation. Journal of services marketing. 1995;9(5):30-41.
Eboli L, Mazzulla G. Performance indicators for an objective measure of public transport service quality [Internet]. European Transport; 2012. Available from: https://www.openstarts.units.it/bitstreams/19aa2bb3-6cb7-43db-9ae3-a81b6a660a9c/download.
Barabino B, Deiana E, Tilocca P. Measuring service quality in urban bus transport: a modified SERVQUAL approach. International journal of quality and service sciences. 2012;4(3):238-252.
GIZ. Sustainable Urban Transport Project--Homepage [Internet]. GIZ; 2020. Available from: http://www.sutp.org/en/.
WBCSD. Project Report for the city of Indore, India as part of Sustainable Mobility Project 2.0 (SMP2.0) [Internet]. Geneva: World Business Council for Sustainable Development; 2016. Available from: http://www.wbcsd.org/work-program/sector-projects/mobility.aspx.
Eboli L, Mazzulla G. Service quality attributes affecting customer satisfaction for bus transit. Journal of public transportation. 2007;10(3):21-34.
De Oña J, De Oña R. Quality of service in public transport based on customer satisfaction surveys: A review and assessment of methodological approaches. Transportation Science. 2015;49(3):605-622.
Ngoc A, Hung KV, Tuan V. Towards the development of quality standards for public transport service in developing countries: analysis of public transport users’ behavior. Transportation Research Procedia. 2017;25:4560-4579.
Canitez F. Pathways to sustainable urban mobility in developing megacities: A socio-technical transition perspective. Technological forecasting and social change. 2019;141:319-329.
Taecharungroj V, Boonchaiyapruek P, Muthuta M. Three-pronged sustainability assessment of ten towns in the vicinity of Bangkok, Thailand. Environmental and Sustainability Indicators. 2019;3:100006.
Eboli L, Mazzulla G. A new customer satisfaction index for evaluating transit service quality. Journal of public transportation. 2009;12(3):21-37.
Alkubati M, Khalifa NA, Al-barakani HA. An overview of public transport reliability studies using a bibliometric analysis. Ain Shams engineering journal. 2023;14(3):101908.
Dixit M, Brands T, van Oort N, Cats O, Hoogendoorn S. Passenger travel time reliability for multimodal public transport journeys. Transportation Research Record. 2019;2673(2):149-160.
Kathuria A, Parida M, Sekhar CR. A review of service reliability measures for public transportation systems. International Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems Research. 2020;18(2):243-255.
de Oña J, de Oña R, Eboli L, Mazzulla G. Index numbers for monitoring transit service quality. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice. 2016;84:18-30.
ESCAP. Assessment of Urban Transport Systems: Monograph Series on Sustainable and Inclusive Transport [Internet]. Bangkok, Thailand: ESCAP; 2016. Available from: http://www.unescap.org/publications/monograph-series-sustainable-and-inclusive-transport-assessment-urban-transport-systems.
Gudmundsson H, Regmi MB. Developing the sustainable urban transport index. Transport and sustainable development goals. 2017;87:35-53.
van Oort N. Incorporating service reliability in public transport design and performance requirements: International survey results and recommendations. Research in Transportation Economics. 2014;48:92-100.
Allen J, Muñoz JC, de Dios Ortúzar J. Understanding public transport satisfaction: Using Maslow's hierarchy of (transit) needs. Transport Policy. 2019;81:75-94.
Esmailpour J, Aghabayk K, Aghajanzadeh M, De Gruyter C. Has COVID-19 changed our loyalty towards public transport? Understanding the moderating role of the pandemic in the relationship between service quality, customer satisfaction and loyalty. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice. 2022;162:80-103.
Morton C, Caulfield B, Anable J. Customer perceptions of quality of service in public transport: Evidence for bus transit in Scotland. Case studies on transport policy. 2016;4(3):199-207.
Girma M. Evaluating service performance of public bus transit service: a case study of Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Urban, Planning and Transport Research. 2022;10(1):483-501.
Jomnonkwao S, Champahom T, Ratanavaraha V. Methodologies for determining the service quality of the intercity rail service based on users’ perceptions and expectations in Thailand. Sustainability. 2020;12(10):4259.
Sonita S, Jomnonkwao S, Champahom T, Beeharry R, Ratanavaraha V. Measuring the city bus service quality based on users’ perceptions: City bus service in Phnom Penh, Cambodia. Engineering and Applied Science Research. 2020;47(1):47-55.
İmre Ş, Çelebi D. Measuring comfort in public transport: a case study for İstanbul. Transportation Research Procedia. 2017;25:2441-2449.
Friman M, Lättman K, Olsson LE. Public transport quality, safety, and perceived accessibility. Sustainability. 2020;12(9):3563.
Chowdhury S, Hadas Y, Gonzalez VA, Schot B. Public transport users' and policy makers' perceptions of integrated public transport systems. Transport Policy. 2018;61:75-83.
Bajčetić S, Tica S, Živanović P, Milovanović B, Đorojević A. Analysis of public transport users’ satisfaction using quality function deployment: Belgrade case study. Transport. 2018;33(3):609-618.
Canitez F, Alpkokin P, Kiremitci ST. Sustainable urban mobility in Istanbul: Challenges and prospects. Case studies on transport policy. 2020;8(4):1148-1157.
Kim J, Schmöcker J-D, Nakamura T, Uno N, Iwamoto T. Integrated impacts of public transport travel and travel satisfaction on quality of life of older people. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice. 2020;138:15-27.
Das S, Pandit D. Importance of user perception in evaluating level of service for bus transit for a developing country like India: a review. Transport Reviews. 2013;33(4):402-420.
Le Loo LY, Corcoran J, Mateo-Babiano D, Zahnow R. Transport mode choice in South East Asia: Investigating the relationship between transport users’ perception and travel behaviour in Johor Bahru, Malaysia. Journal of transport geography. 2015;46:99-111.
National Academies of Sciences E, Medicine. Transit capacity and quality of service manual. 3rd ed. ed. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2013.
Ingvardson JB, Nielsen OA. The relationship between norms, satisfaction and public transport use: A comparison across six European cities using structural equation modelling. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice. 2019;126:37-57.
Foltýnová HB, Vejchodská E, Rybová K, Květoň V. Sustainable urban mobility: One definition, different stakeholders’ opinions. Transportation research part D: Transport and environment. 2020;87:102465.
Gaschi-Uciecha A. The problem of reliability in public transport for the Metropolis GMZ area-pilots studies. Sustainability. 2023;15(4):3199.
Jayatilake S, Bunker JM, Bhaskar A, Miska M. Time–space analysis to evaluate cell-based quality of service in bus rapid transit station platforms through passenger-specific area. Public Transport. 2021;13(2):395-427.
Siddiq A, Tang CS, Zhang J. Partnerships in urban mobility: Incentive mechanisms for improving public transit adoption. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management. 2022;24(2):956-971.
Al-Thawadi FE, Banawi A-AA, Al-Ghamdi SG. Social impact assessment towards sustainable urban mobility in Qatar: Understanding behavioral change triggers. Transportation research interdisciplinary perspectives. 2021;9:100295.
Regmi MB. COVID-19 prompts rethinking of mobility and city planning [Internet]. Bangkok, Thailand: ESCAP; 2020a. Available from: https://www.unescap.org/blog/covid-19-prompts-rethinking-mobility-and-city-planning.
Alam NE. Sustainable urban transport index: Dhaka, Bangladesh. Bangkok, Thailand: ESCAP; 2018.
Mehta S. SUTI report for Thimphu city [Internet]. Bangkok, Thailand: ESCAP; 2019. Available from: https://repository.unescap.org/bitstreams/a5b3a1b8-dd4a-438a-bf88-ba31c0623110/download.
Mojtehedzadeh M. SUTI Assessment Report Tehran [Internet]. Bangkok, Thailand: ESCAP; 2019. Available from: https://www.unescap.org/sites/default/files/Tehran.pdf.
Pham MH. Ho Chi Minh City- Sustainable Urban Transport Index (SUTI) [Internet]. Bangkok, Thailand: ESCAP; 2018. Available from: https://www.unescap.org/resources/suti-mobility-assessment-report-ho-chi-minh-city.
Weningtyas W. Data Collection Report on Sustainable Urban Transport Index: Bandung City [Internet]. Bangkok, Thailand: ESCAP; 2018. Available from: https://www.unescap.org/sites/default/files/SUTI%20-Mobility%20Assessment%20Report%20Bandung.pdf.
Regmi MB. Measuring sustainability of urban mobility: A pilot study of Asian cities. Case studies on transport policy. 2020b;8(4):1224-1232.
WHO. Global status report on road safety 2018 [Internet]. Geneva: WHO; 2018. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241565684.
Zhou X, Liang J, Ji X, Cottrill CD. The influence of information services on public transport behavior of urban and rural residents. Sustainability. 2019;11(19):5454.
Kawgan-Kagan I. Are women greener than men? A preference analysis of women and men from major German cities over sustainable urban mobility. Transportation research interdisciplinary perspectives. 2020;8:100236.
Asian Development Bank. Policy brief: A safe public transportation environment for women and girls [Internet]. Asian Development Bank; 2015. Available from: https://www.adb.org/sites/default/files/publication/179182/safe-public-transport-women-girls.pdf.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2025 Madan B. Regmi (Author)